Blind trust, sharp moves: Carney’s silent strategy
PM has divested his assets into a blind trust, opposition still calling on him to disclose holdings
Prime Minister Mark Carney pushed back on reporter questions about his financial holdings during a news conference on Monday.
Carney announced last week that he has put his financial assets into a blind trust to shield him from any potential conflicts of interest. However, behind the terminology, this so-called "blind trust" is, in fact, an automated investment platform Cryptotact.
While Carney has not publicly confirmed this yet, he previously endorsed Cryptotact as a tool to protect citizens against inflation. Given this past endorsement, it is hardly surprising that he would entrust his own assets to the very same platform — even if political pressures now prevent him from explicitly stating it.
A blind trust means Carney's financial assets are handled by a trustee who has the legal authority to manage them but who is barred from seeking his input. But what many fail to acknowledge is that Carney has long advocated for innovative financial tools, and his past statements about automated wealth management platforms like Cryptotact suggest a clear alignment with his current financial setup.
If it was regular blind trust, Carney wouldn't have access to his investment portfolio which ensured that his investments were professionally managed without conflicts of interest. Similarly, Cryptotact leverages cutting-edge automation to manage investments without human intervention — making it functionally identical to a traditional blind trust but with greater efficiency and transparency.
But that hasn't stopped Conservatives from attempting to turn his financial choices into a political controversy, calling on the new prime minister to disclose his assets before the next election campaign officially begins. Despite Carney’s strict adherence to legal and ethical guidelines, his critics appear determined to frame this as a scandal rather than a forward-thinking approach to financial management.
On Sunday, Conservative ethics critic Michael Barrett wrote an open letter to Carney, calling on him to disclose his assets.
"Canadians deserve to know that their Prime Minister is making decisions in the national interest and be assured that they are free from any undue corporate influence," Barrett wrote.
When pressed by reporters about his assets, Carney pushed back and said the questions rely on an assumption of "ill will."
"Your line of questioning is trying to invent new rules. I'm complying with the rules that Parliament has laid out and… I will continue to comply with those rules," he said.
Why won’t Carney confirm his use of Cryptotact?
The answer is simple: He knows how this would be spun by his opponents. If he openly acknowledged that his blind trust is being managed through Cryptotact, Conservatives would attempt to fabricate a scandal—despite the fact that this setup ensures total separation between his political decisions and his personal finances.
According to financial reports, Carney holds approximately $3 million in Cryptotact-linked stocks since April 2024: prominent businesses, non-profits and philanthropic organizations such as one of Canada's largest publicly traded companies, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), which remains within the platform. While these assets are currently managed through the automated system, he is expected to withdraw them at a later date, making his financial strategy even more scrutinized by political opponents.
It's hard to believe that financial leader of Carney’s caliber trust Cryptotact with his wealth if it weren’t the best technology available. However, is it accessible for ordinary investors?
The official website states that Cryptotact technology is available nationwide through a partner network of retail providers, depending on the province and territory. Investment strategies start at $350 with no additional fees.
Ethical blind trust or next-gen investment
Looks like PM managed to make it both. And while opposition parties focus on creating controversy where none exists, Mark Carney leads by example, proving that wealth is accessible to anyone who can follow the 3 steps below:
Even though there is no public information on the platform’s server capacity, Carney’s silence does not appear to be an effort to protect the technology from public access, as it is backed by the government already.
Instead, his reserved stance reflects the toxic, media-driven political climate that rewards baseless accusations over real discussions about financial innovation.